I prefer to use automation to lift the quieter sections, achieving the same result without crushing the louder sections. ![]() So for example, often when we push something up into a limiter, the quieter sections sound louder but the loudest sections are squashed down by the extra processing and just end up sounding slightly distorted instead. Unfortunately the denser versions were still louder after the reduction, although much less - the 8LUFS input version was about 1dB louder than the -12LUFS-input-version.Great to see you experimenting ! Can I suggest a follow-up ?Ĭompare the -8 and -12 versions (with LP adjustment) and then see if you can get the "benefits" of the -8 version, without raising the overall level. the result was interesting - and the limits of the algorithus were clearly recorded. I did a test for myself and loaded different loud/density versions onto youtube and then, after the reduction through youtube, compared them again. The algorithm of r128 (with other target LUFS) is it not my guess - maybe more like replay gain?ĭid you make invers engineering or do you get information about the measurement technology from the different platforms? Unfortunately the denser versions were still louder after the reduction, although much less - the 8LUFS input version was about 1dB louder than the -12LUFS-input version.ĭo you know the exact algorithms of the different platforms? ![]() The good thing about this site though is no-one has to take anyone's word for it, people can listen, measure and make up their own minds.i did a test for myself and loaded different loud/density versions onto youtube and then, after the reduction through youtube, compared them again. But of course people can preview the lower levels themselves pretty simply.Īs far as the "density" issue goes, in my experience it's far less important than balance and dynamic structure. That's fair comment, and if it proves popular we have all kinds of ideas about how to improve the site.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |